Paragraph (e) Team Member and Responder Participation To be effective, any safety and health program needs the meaningful participation of workers and their representatives. Similarly, for the Emergency Response Program (ERP) to be effective, team members and responders need to be involved in establishing, operating, evaluating, and improving the ERP. Proposed paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) […]
Section E – OSHA ERS 1910.156 Rule Read More »
Paragraph (d) ESO Establishment of ERP and Emergency Service(s) Capability Paragraph (d) of the proposed rule sets forth the ESO’s responsibility to establish and implement an Emergency Response Program (ERP). As explained above in the Summary and Explanation for paragraph (c), the purpose of this rulemaking is to reduce responder injuries and fatalities, and a
Section D – OSHA 1910.156 ERS Rule Read More »
A significant distinction in the new OSHA 1910.156 Emergency Response Standard is the difference between an ESO organization and a WERE employee. In the context of the OSHA Emergency Response Standard (29 CFR 1910.120), the terms “WERE” and “ESO” refer to different roles within emergency response operations: WERE (Workplace Emergency Response Employee): This term typically
Paragraph (c) Organization of the WERT, and Establishment of the ERP and Emergency Service(s) Capability As noted in the Summary and Explanation for proposed paragraph (a) Scope, the proposed rule would not apply to any employer that is not an Emergency Service Organization (ESO) and does not have a Workplace Emergency Response Team (WERT). Nothing
Section C – OSHA 1910.156 ERS Rule Read More »
